🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a useful starting point," stated the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced concerns. An organization founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to create products and services that are safe and suitable for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to copy this path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies take a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to self-regulate.